Whether or not that’s true, Google’s Matt Cutt hasn’t been shy about his feelings on the topic: “Honestly, I’m not a huge fan of article marketing … Typically the sorts of sites that just republish these articles are not the highest quality sites.”
There’s more: Check out the full article here.
Never actually submitted anything to any of them, but guess it cant hurt,
@Nathan 229255 wrote:
Some marketers feel that the Google Panda crackdown on link farms has hurt the effectiveness of article marketing, as well.
Whether or not that’s true, Google’s Matt Cutt hasn’t been shy about his feelings on the topic: “Honestly, I’m not a huge fan of article marketing … Typically the sorts of sites that just republish these articles are not the highest quality sites.”
There’s more: Check out the full article here.
If you get traffic from this then go for it … but do not continue on with this for link equity … it will eventually all vanish IMO.
If you disagree, then go right ahead and keep going with these antiquated link acquisition methods … it simply makes my job much much easier in the long run
After that comment, I made sure I would do an extensive research on any article-site I plan on submitting in. I not only check sites’ classic SEO parameters (SERP ranking, PR, longevity & many many more) but also carefully browse through users lists & published submissions.
If the site itself still ranks high, has a considerable proportion of certified users (official representative of a real brand), and most improtantly – no obvious spam is found, I think it’s still safe to submit an article. Let’s face it – those sites are some of the most accessible sources for link-building, and it would be hard to give up on them altogether.
On the practical perspective – I’ve been applying this method for a long time now and I can say it definitely works!
They have not regained the search visibility they used to enjoy and do NOT rank where they used to.
Panda Vol. II: Ehow.com got hit this time – SEO-Blog – SISTRIX Toolbox
If this is you link building strategy … have fun with it as long as it last, but IMO you should really consider changing it now
I didn’t know this site personally but practically EVERYONE who gave examples to why panda doesn’t work well mentioned eHow specifically, including Matt Cutts.
I will continue this strategy. Close inspection of the GOOD article-sites will show you what’s the difference between content-farming to added-value sites. No way are google going to allow themselves to damage consensus sites like that again.
If you don’t believe that you might as well give-up on link-building altogether. After all, there might be a “Zebra” update in the future that will eliminate all blogs, an “Iguana” update that will eliminate all forums, a “Kangaroo” update that will eliminate all sites including banners, and so on and so forth.
.. then you decide to go after me personally … you simply missed the point altogether … article directories for link building are a thing of the past … yes, they may still pass some value but they do not pass the same equity as they used to and will continue to lose more and more equity over time – people need to learn to evolve their strategies
Again – this was a very effective strategy before – if you are still showing positive results, then stick with it. I haven’t used this method for a over 18 months as it just doesn’t work the way it used to.
I tell ya what … keep building links the way you want … I will build them the way I want … end of story
Please login or Register to submit your answer