Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Why wager share is bad for affiliates

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 7 posts - 31 through 37 (of 37 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #694305
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I agree, I was looking for other programs to support and have found no other highly recommended programs that pay as well as casino rewards use too. Anyone know of anywhere that pays 30-35% rev share (no negative carryover).

    #694312
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Dominique wrote:
    Keep in mind that the majority of programs start you out on 25%, not 35%.

    You get 35% after you reach a certain volume with most programs.

    So for the majority of affiliates, the % offered here is still substantially superior, even if it is somewhat lower than 35%.

    you still speaking about 35% and 25% and the reality is the program is now only 1% since on my experiences 90% of player deposit in a casino only one time or two and desperate

    #695088
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ryan,

    While I appreciate your initiative, I think you should show a monthly comparaison between the actual rev share and the wager share model.

    In fact, I’m not too sure if I need to push you harder, due to this new model, and I’m sure lots of other affiliates have the same feeling. Actually, I’m sending some traffic, but due to the ‘complexity’ of this new model (in rev share, a player deposit $100 you earn a percentage, here there are payouts for each game, etc…), I’m really afraid of risking serious traffic.

    If you’re so sure about this new model, then you should show that for affiliates it’s business as usual, by showing them the figures.

    You can’t lose anything by being the most transparent possible, IMO, because I’m sure that serious affiliates (the ones that are making you money) will evaluate the numbers on a longer period than two days… :rasta:

    Personally, I’m really interested to see how this revenue model could perform.

    #695286
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    filakon wrote:
    you still speaking about 35% and 25% and the reality is the program is now only 1% since on my experiences 90% of player deposit in a casino only one time or two and desperate

    That’s exactly what the problem is all about. It’s true, both models have pros and cons and for affiliates that send a lot of converting traffic and loyal players the difference might be not so great.

    On the other hand,for affiliates like me who send medium-low amounts of traffic comparing to the higher traffic affiliates the difference is huge.

    The bottom is inevitable and speaks for it self for small-mid size affiliates.
    The profit from the Casino Rewards program is now at a level that bearly scratches the $50 in a good month for me.

    So far i have given Casino Rewards a top priority exposure on my sites.
    The current status of all the programs i work with proves that the programs that offer an initial 25% do generate much more income for me than the 35% true wager.

    It looks like i have no choice but give the 25% programs the maximum exposure. With all the respect i have for the RA program, it doesn’t work for me any more.

    #695295
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    M.D wrote:
    On the other hand,for affiliates like me who send medium-low amounts of traffic comparing to the higher traffic affiliates the difference is huge.

    It isn’t how many players you send, it is how much the players you do send actually play.

    If it was about how many players you sent, I would drop it because I could likely make more money elsewhere since I concentrate on player value, not numbers.

    #695301
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Dominique wrote:
    It isn’t how many players you send, it is how much the players you do send actually play.

    If it was about how many players you sent, I would drop it because I could likely make more money elsewhere since I concentrate on player value, not numbers.

    Indeed, I should of been more clear. English is not my first language and i tend to make such mistakes.
    What i meant was in regards to more “big players”, naturally the more traffic one gets, the more chances he has to send more and bigger players.

    Unfortunately, the current situation remains as is though for me and those who are like me.

    However, whining is not my course of action, with the amount of traffic my sites get and the players i convert, i’m forced to give prominant advert spots and efforts to programs which practice the good old rev share.

    #695936
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I can tell you from my own experience the wagershare on rewardsaffiliates compared to casinoblasters is night and day. I am making significantly more (nearly 5x as much)on the same traffic with casinoblasters. I think this wagershare implementation was a huge mistake at least for people who constantly send new players.

Viewing 7 posts - 31 through 37 (of 37 total)