- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 10, 2005 at 2:28 pm #670566AnonymousInactive
Hi Everbody,
Please be aware that we have taken your concerns into consideration and we are aggressively working on an alternative to the current situation and we will hopefully have a mutually beneficial solution by next week.
Regards,
Antoinette
August 10, 2005 at 3:08 pm #670569vladcizsolMemberThank you Antoinette. We are eager to hear about the positive changes next week.
August 10, 2005 at 5:32 pm #670575AnonymousInactiveThank you Antoinette. I am also eager to hear of the positve changes that will be announced.
August 10, 2005 at 6:42 pm #670580AnonymousInactiveI would be delighted to put things back the way they were – and fix my blacklist and mail my players.
Looking forward to details.
August 16, 2005 at 1:15 am #670914AnonymousInactiveExcellent news Antoinette!!
August 16, 2005 at 1:51 pm #670958AnonymousInactivevegaspartner wrote:Hi Everbody,Please be aware that we have taken your concerns into consideration and we are aggressively working on an alternative to the current situation and we will hopefully have a mutually beneficial solution by next week.
Regards,
AntoinetteThis is encouraging news! Thank you for listening to our concerns. I am eager for more details….
August 19, 2005 at 3:38 pm #671236AnonymousInactiveWell “next week” as come and just about gone. Dont follow that carrot they have dangling in front of your face – it seems they want to get as much as they can by dragging us along! Well VP can :kissass:
August 19, 2005 at 3:56 pm #671242AnonymousInactiveAntoinette, do you have any news to share with us?
August 22, 2005 at 7:49 am #671388AnonymousInactiveHi Everyone,
We are still currently in contact with a few affiliates with regards to the best way forward. We will definitely have an answer for you before the end of this month.
I apologize for not letting you know earlier.
Please feel free to contact me should you have any queries.
Regards,
Antoinette
August 22, 2005 at 11:18 am #671391vladcizsolMemberQuote:We are still currently in contact with a few affiliates with regards to the best way forward. We will definitely have an answer for you before the end of this month.Antoinette this is NOT what we were previously told!!! :cuss:
When did this CHANGE?
I spoke with Tyrone and I was lead to believe you guys HAD forumlated a positive plan and were in the process of implementing it! Now you are saying we have to run it past other affiliates for THEIR approval????? :madat: :madat: :madat:
This is NOT AT ALL in keeping with the good news you announced last week!!!! Are you trying to make fools of us?
August 22, 2005 at 1:50 pm #671401AnonymousInactiveA few affiliates?
You need to talk to all of your affiliates, not make policies based on a few opinons in a backroom and expect everyone to accept it.
I feel I have been made a fool of, I took you off my blacklist in good faith.
I sure hope this doesn’t mean we are being led around by the nose!!! I rarely get really angry, and it’s not a pretty picture.
I expected news TODAY!!!!!
August 22, 2005 at 2:03 pm #671405AnonymousInactiveOnce again, Vegas Partner has lied to us.
Thank you Antoinette, for giving us false hope, and for continuing to rape us for yet another week.
:slapface: :shooter:
August 22, 2005 at 2:27 pm #671410AnonymousInactiveHi Everyone,
We have received varying opinions from a few of our affiliates. Two of the strongest opinions are as follows:
1) The first would be to not bundle the casinos and have some type of insurance policy for the affiliate whereby if a player has a big win, this player will go into quarantine on that casino until his negative is recovered. Affiliates will then get paid on this casino with this player being removed as well as the other casinos. With this policy in place, the risk is only on our part, to retain the player.
2) The second option is to go back to the old method of not bundling of casinos.
We will have a challenge of setting up the stats for the first method if we go with it.
We would however like to ask your opinion as to which method you would prefer.
We are also considering other opinions as well. Please rest assured that we will make changes to our current model by the month end.
Regards,
Antoinette
August 22, 2005 at 2:51 pm #671412vladcizsolMemberThank you for clarifying that Antoinette :kisser:
I am fine with either option. Since number is 2 is far easier to implement and can be done very quickly I think its probably the choice I would recommend.
August 22, 2005 at 3:28 pm #671414AnonymousInactiveI would “2” first and then work on “1”. And btw, a solution WAS supposed to be found by last week. “2” does not require our approval as long as we are appropriately compensated for the difference since the new T&C was approved.
-
AuthorPosts