- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Also thinking about this, would it not be better to just not give any power to bad links? Why are they forcing us to oust bad sites for them? seems a bit odd, like were helping you, but your actually doing 90,000,000 hours of work for us for free?
maybe its process of elimination all free , maybe there seeing what sites your outing and then keeping and judging you on that
I just simply added google, as i never requested a link from them
@allfreechips 245989 wrote:
where is this tool insiode webmaster tools?
i actually couldn’t find it in webmaster tools, but found a link to it from the google blog post
@allfreechips 245990 wrote:
Also thinking about this, would it not be better to just not give any power to bad links? Why are they forcing us to oust bad sites for them? seems a bit odd, like were helping you, but your actually doing 90,000,000 hours of work for us for free?
Stripping power to bad links is THE only fair way.
Otherwise stupid tools like that one are needed.Maybe http://www.casinoaffiliateprograms.com/bb/47064-google-is-lazy-and-stupid.html
Yah I always thought they said there was no such thing as negative SEO – obviously you never could and still can’t control who links to you! Sounds to me if this tool was actually legit that there is indeed negative SEO …
Maybe this is a ploy to get WMs to walk right into a trap of some sorts.
@arkyt 246010 wrote:
Maybe this is a ploy to get WMs to walk right into a trap of some sorts.
What do you mean? what kind of trap are you thinking?
