- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 27, 2012 at 3:00 am #822835AnonymousInactive
Facebook doesn’t really rank for anything competitive other than “facebook” does it?
March 27, 2012 at 3:06 am #822836burundiMember@bingoadvantage 237753 wrote:
Facebook doesn’t really rank for anything competitive other than “facebook” does it?
According to semrush facebook is getting almost 300,000,000 search visits per month..
Seems to be ranking for millions of keywords..March 27, 2012 at 3:54 am #822840AnonymousInactiveSure, with over 500 million “active” users and how many just type facebook in the search bar to get there. Not to mention all the George McSomename ultra non-competitive keywords.
March 27, 2012 at 3:56 am #822841AnonymousInactive@bingoadvantage 237753 wrote:
Facebook doesn’t really rank for anything competitive other than “facebook” does it?
Doesn’t matter if it does or not.
Traffic is traffic – money is money – they got both.And so does google.
They both have a product that works and people use.
What a ‘different’ world it would be without a huge facebook type site!
(in comparison, myspace stinks).March 27, 2012 at 3:45 pm #822874bosshoggsMember@Play 237754 wrote:
According to semrush facebook is getting almost 300,000,000 search visits per month..
Seems to be ranking for millions of keywords..You are totally right on… And now what’s happening with all of the algorithm updates in that Social Media is playing an even bigger part in boosting SEO.
And… IMO… that’s why Google is putting a stronger precedence in Google +. Sites that are getting more +1’s are getting a boost in PR.
April 4, 2012 at 5:23 am #823161AnonymousInactiveThat’s not a bad idea for a t-shirt. ‘Imagine a world without Facebook’
@rmeeuwsen 237759 wrote:
Doesn’t matter if it does or not.
Traffic is traffic – money is money – they got both.And so does google.
They both have a product that works and people use.
What a ‘different’ world it would be without a huge facebook type site!
(in comparison, myspace stinks). -
AuthorPosts