- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Listen to the audio.
First Rush insinuates he doesn’t know what Skull and Bones is but when the caller displays a good grasp of the facts Rush has to acknowledge Skull and Bones and then try and whitewash it.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/030904inaflap.html
:rolleyes:
When I lived in Oklahoma, I used to get his show on the radio.
He’s such a dork.
Incredible that these people and reporters on CNN etc are all
paid to LIE … the better they are at lying the better their careers.
:rolleyes:
Skull & Bones: The Secret Society That Unites John Kerry and President Bush
Published on Thursday, January 22, 2004 by Pacifica Radio’s Democracy Now!
A little-known fact unites Democratic frontrunner John Kerry and President Bush: they are both members of Yale’s secret society Skull and Bones. We speak with the author of “Secrets of the Tomb: Skull and Bones, the Ivy League, and the Hidden Paths of Power” that reveals details about the secret society and its members.
The New Hampshire primary is just a few days away and Howard Dean’s status as the frontrunner has almost totally dissipated. The latest Boston Herald poll now shows that John Kerry holds a 10 point lead – a major surge for the Massachusetts Senator. Still reeling from his victory in Iowa, Kerry is starting to act like the frontrunner, shifting his focus from comparing himself to the other Democrats to putting his record up against President George W. Bush, saying he is the only candidate who can beat Bush and who represents a real difference from the current occupant of the White House.
But there is a fact about Kerry’s past that brings him closer to Bush than any of the other candidates. Both Bush and Kerry are members of a secretive society dating back to their respective days at Yale University – Skull and Bones. This fact has not been widely reported but when Kerry’s campaign spokesperson was asked about it, she said, “John Kerry has absolutely nothing to say on that subject. Sorry.”
Skull and Bones, CFR, Bilderbergs, Rhodes Scolars etc prove one
thing:America hasn’t had any free presidential elections in over
1 0 0 Y E A R S.Free presidential elections are an ILLUSION since ALL the candidates are PRE SELECTED for the American people,
sometimes years ahead of time.Why ?
Slaves work better when they believe they are free.
Don’t forget you have until the 15 of April to send your masters
your money.:rolleyes:
On the topic of political corruption, here’s just one way the Government of the U.S. (most notably the re-election engineers for the Bush Campaign – the same ones who brought/bought you florida in the last election) are stripping the U.S. of their free speech without direct censorship:
Are you involved in a local or national non-profit or public interest organization? As a leader or board director or member? Please read this message carefully, because your organization could be facing a serious threat.
The Republican National Committee is pressing the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) to issue new rules that would cripple groups that dare to communicate with the public in any way critical of President Bush or members of Congress. Incredibly, the FEC has just issued — for public comment — proposed rules that would do just that. Any kind of non-profit — conservative, progressive, labor, religious, secular, social service, charitable, educational, civic participation, issue-oriented, large, and small — could be affected by these rules.
By the way, one thing FEC’s proposed rules do not affect is the donations you may have made in the past or may make now to MoveOn.org or to the MoveOn.org Voter Fund. They are aimed at activist non-profit groups, not donors.
Operatives in Washington are displaying a terrifying disregard for the values of free speech and openness which underlie our democracy. Essentially, they are willing to pay any price to stop criticism of Bush administration policy.
We’ve attached materials below to help you make a public comment to the FEC before the comment period ends on APRIL 9th. Your comment could be very important, because normally the FEC doesn’t get much public feedback.
Public comments to the FEC are encouraged by email at
Comments should be addressed to Ms. Mai T. Dinh, Acting Assistant General Counsel, and must include the full name, electronic mail address, and postal service address of the commenter.
More details can be found at:
http://www.fec.gov/press/press2004/20040312rulemaking.html
We’d love to see a copy of your public comment. Please email us a copy at [email protected].
Whether or not you’re with a non-profit, we also suggest you ask your representatives to write a letter to the FEC opposing the rule change.
Some key points:
– Campaign finance reform was not meant to gag public interest organizations.
– Political operatives are trying to silence opposition to Bush policy.
– The Federal Election Commission has no legal right to treat non-profit interest groups as political committees. Congress and the courts have specifically considered and rejected such regulation.You can reach your representatives at:
Senator Don Nickles
Phone: 202-224-5754Senator James M. Inhofe
Phone: 202-224-4721Congressman Frank D. Lucas
Phone: 202-225-5565Please let us know you’re calling, at:
http://www.moveon.org/callmade.html?id=2541-3524631-wzZ_mkDQi37w7DU6RYd5Nw
In a non-election year, this kind of administrative overreach would never find support. It goes far beyond any existing law or precedent. It is a serious threat to the fundamental checks and balances in our system. But because of an unholy alliance between a few campaign reform groups and GOP partisans, this rule change could actually happen if we don’t act now.
I’ve attached more details below, prepared by our attorneys and by the FEC Working Group — a group of more than 500 respected non-profit organizations.
If you run a non-profit, don’t assume this change doesn’t apply to you. First check out the EXAMPLES OF SPECIFIC CONSEQUENCES FOR NONPROFIT GROUPS section below. It’s outrageous.
Thanks for all you do,
Sincerely,
–Wes Boyd
MoveOn.org
March 30th, 2004To understand political corruption you have to understand this:
Communism is a CAPITALIST creation.
Communism was FINANCED by the capitalists to allow them
to have MONOPOLY over ALL land, ALL Services, ALL products
ALL slaves.CAPITALISM is just another form of eventual total enslavement.
The New World Order controls both illusions.
:rolleyes:
Kerry accused of violating campaign law
By Ralph Z. Hallow
THE WASHINGTON TIMESPresident Bush’s re-election campaign and the Republican National Committee yesterday accused Democratic challenger Sen. John Kerry’s campaign formally of illegal coordination of political advertising with anti-Bush groups and donors, including billionaire George Soros.
“Senator Kerry, who supported the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act, is now the beneficiary of the single largest conspiracy to violate campaign-finance laws in history,” RNC Chief Counsel Jill Holtzman Vogel said yesterday at a press conference with Bush campaign and other RNC officials.
The RNC and the Bush team filed the complaint with the Federal Election Commission, saying the Kerry campaign and pro-Kerry groups not affiliated with it or the Democratic Party are violating the landmark campaign-finance law passed last year.
The complaint is intended only as a precursor to a federal court case. Campaign and Republican officials are asking the FEC to dismiss the complaint quickly so that they can bring suit in a federal court to block the use of “soft money” — unlimited donations from corporations, unions and individuals — to finance the ads by such groups as MoveOn.org.
Originally, the act’s supporters said the legislation would take “big money” out of election financing. Opponents said it would curtail free speech and undermine political parties in favor of outside interests and rich donors.
The Republican complaint says that groups organized under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Service code are asking individuals for unlimited, unregulated donations, using the pitch that the money will be spent to defeat Mr. Bush or elect Mr. Kerry.
Providing that money would be a crime on the donor’s part.
The law carries stiff financial penalties and incarceration for violators.The complaint also says that the groups soliciting the soft-money donations also are committing a federal crime merely by seeking donations to affect a federal election.
Republicans argue that these groups will have to register as political committees, who are subject to several federal regulations, including limits on the amount a donor can give, if they want to engage in federal election activities.
“They are making a mockery of the rules established during a long and arduous debate,” Marc Racicot, chairman of the Bush campaign, said yesterday.
The campaign-finance law, passed after years of heated debate over its ban on “soft money” and limits on issue ads, was sponsored by Sens. John McCain, Arizona Republican, and Russell D. Feingold, Wisconsin Democrat. Michael Meehan, a senior adviser to the Kerry campaign, denied the Republican accusations.
“Bush and the Republicans have taken March Madness and April Foolishness to new levels,” Mr. Meehan said. “This frivolous complaint is not worth the paper it is written on. John Kerry and his campaign have nothing to do with these ads or the groups that run them.”
The Republicans aimed their complaints against the Media Fund, the MoveOn.org Voter Fund and other such groups, some of which have pledged to raise millions of dollars in soft money from individuals.
The Media Fund and MoveOn.org financed nearly $10 million in anti-Bush ads since Mr. Kerry clinched the nomination March 2.
Republicans say the ads aired at about the same time that Mr. Kerry’s campaign made its ad buys. One Media Fund ad included items in Mr. Kerry’s tax plan before he made them public.In addition, the Republican complaint identifies many officials in Media Fund and MoveOn.org as having once worked for the Kerry campaign.
An entry on the blog at Mr. Kerry’s official Web site (http://blog.johnkerry.com/blog/archives/000871.html#more) said the East Bay for Kerry team of Berkeley, Calif., and MoveOn.org had “combined forces” for a joint house party featuring an appearance by Teresa Heinz Kerry, the senator’s wife.
“The East Bay for Kerry/MoveOn House party on December 7th combined the forces of two grass-roots organizations based in San Francisco East Bay Area. We had 200 guests eating, drinking, and watching the MoveOn Documentary ‘Uncovered’ featuring Joseph Wilson and Rand Beers from the Kerry campaign,” reads the entry from Pamela Leavey.
A recent MoveOn.org TV ad does not mention Mr. Kerry or urge viewers to vote against Mr. Bush. Instead, with a picture of Mr. Bush on the screen, an announcer lays out a case that the president misinformed the nation about the threat posed by Iraq.
The ad concludes with the admonition: “When a president misleads us, he must face the consequences. Congress should censure President Bush now.” The word “censure” is superimposed above the picture.
Wes Boyd, president of the MoveOn.org Voter Fund, yesterday denied any illegal coordination. “We do not coordinate with the Kerry campaign,” Mr. Boyd said in a statement. “These charges are baseless and irresponsible.”
Mr. Meehan noted that Mr. Racicot, when he was RNC chairman, joined a constitutional challenge of the new law but lost in a 5-4 Supreme Court decision.
RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie responded with a quote from an old Bobby Fuller song: “I fought the law and the law won.” “It’s the law of the land,” he added.
Jim Jordan, spokesman for the Media Fund and another group named in the complaint, America Coming Together, dismissed the Republican accusations as “the politics of distraction and intimidation.”
He said the accusations were “a transparent and ineffectual attempt by the Bush campaign and the Republican Party to silence their critics and to change the subject of these elections away from the failed policies of this administration.”
Mr. Bush has an expected cash advantage of about $100 million over Mr. Kerry, based on individual donations of $2,000 or less. But Democrats have had a traditional advantage with “independent expenditure” groups — which span the political spectrum from MoveOn.org to the conservative Club for Growth.
Republicans say that with the parties no longer able to accept “soft money,” these groups have become liberals’ preferred conduit for those funds.
Kerry linked to illegal contributions
Sent 28 letters on behalf of defense contractor who pleaded guilty
Posted: February 19, 2004
10:51 a.m. Eastern
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Democratic front-runner John Kerry, who claims he is not beholden to campaign contributors, wrote 28 letters on behalf of a San Diego defense contractor who has pleaded guilty to illegally funneling cash to the senator’s campaign.According to a report in the Los Angeles Times, Kerry tried to free up federal funds for a missile system Parthasarathi “Bob” Majumder was trying to build for U.S. warplanes.
The letters, sent from 1996 through 1998, went to members of Congress and Pentagon officials during a period when both Majumder and employees of his Science and Applied Technology Inc. were donating to Kerry’s campaign, the Times reported. Dwight L. Morris and Associates, which tracks campaign donations, says Kerry took in about $25,000 from the contractor and his employees during a three-year period.
The paper reports court documents show Majumder told employees they needed to make contributions to members of Congress and later reimbursed his workers with proceeds from government contracts. Majumder’s guilty plea was entered last week.
Nearly all of the $25,000 was reimbursed by Majumder, though federal prosecutors say there is no evidence Kerry or four congressmen who also received donations knew of the scheme.
A company in Kerry’s state, Millitech, based in Northampton, Mass., had teamed up with Science and Applied Technology Inc. to work on government contracts. The Times reports in the mid-1990s, Kerry visited the San Diego company, and some employees at Science and Applied Technology attended a fund-raiser for Kerry.
“It obviously raises questions about whether the campaign contributions bought action from Kerry,” Steven Weiss, communications director of the Center for Responsive Politics in Washington, told the paper.
Here’s another story from WorldNetDaily
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37631Kerry and Bush are with the same group behind the scenes.
The U.S. is no better than a Banana Republic when it comes to
presidential elections.You can choose to stay in the matrix or face reality.
The new Master of Deception?
Retail Sales Rise by 1.8 Percent in March Not True?
The Misery Index As Interpreted By John Kerry
“If the truth doesn’t work for you, make shit up!” John Kerry
The 3 Stooges go to war
Actually Bush is not that stupid if you consider that his Dad
got much of the fat contracts because of the war in Iraq and
Afghanistan … and he loves the fact that the longer the wars
last the more money they make … so look for him to stretch
the wars as looooooooong as possible … in fact sites on
the internet have reported that he or Kerry will start
DRAFTING for more slaves to go fight for the empire after the
November election.
