Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

on rollover

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #585316
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    javascript onrollover:

    (a) does nothing but take up bandwidth
    (b) harms you in SEO
    (c) helps you in SEO

    thanks for you opinions!

    Bernie

    #650512
    vladcizsol
    Member

    on rollover for text? for links? for graphic change?

    #650513
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Oh,

    For text links, in the status bar, where you see a descriptor instead of the [url]http://[/url] url …. down at the bottom.

    My bad :3eyes:

    #650514
    vladcizsol
    Member

    I see this all the time and am guessing people do it to mask affiliate ids.

    Does it have merit? I dont know….

    Does it hurt SEO, probably not

    Does it help SEO, probably not

    I guess if you want to mask affiliate links it serves its purpose, if not why bother?

    Sorry its not much help, but I dont do rollovers on links and havent really seen the benefits…

    #650516
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I agree with you. I am putting them on one of my clean sites. I was doing it simply to make it completely sealed. I guess I’m just being a perfectionist :)

    Thanks for infos!

    #650522
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The less Javascript, the better… in fact the less code, the better.

    I don’t think it would hurt anything though, unless your Javascript was non-standard, or loading images from a different site (result: your whole site appears to hang if the other site is down or unavailable).

    #650534
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Cluttering your code with uneccessary trash will always hurt you for seo. This is one obvious example.


    When I see this I see a domain hiding or ashamed of something. I personally would not have anything to do with such a domain.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)