- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 2, 2006 at 4:53 pm #597406AnonymousInactive
Neteller has released a short statement concerning the the recent actions of our corrupt lawmakers.
http://content.neteller.com/content/en/member_businessupdate.htm
on a side note:
Those of you who frequent gaming rooms, ie: pokerroom.com should start chatter concerning Nov. elections and to vote Democrat. Those of you who don’t it might be a good idea if you have spare time.October 2, 2006 at 5:00 pm #708596AnonymousInactiveQuote:It is currently unclear how NETELLER, a European company, with no assets, presence or employees in the US, would be affected by this bill. Once the regulations have been written, NETELLER will have a clearer view of which companies are affected, how those companies will be expected to comply, and any possible resulting impact on NETELLER and its US facing business.NETELLER continues to operate its business as normal.
It’s with bated breath we all wait to see what impact this legislation will have on alternative payment options.
October 2, 2006 at 5:15 pm #708605AnonymousInactiveFergie wrote:It’s with bated breath we all wait to see what impact this legislation will have on alternative payment options.I think changes will be made once they see how things shake out. By the language in that briefing it seems to me they believe this legislation won’t and shouldn’t affect them. Having said that I am sure they will have to make changes with their US customers.
October 2, 2006 at 6:31 pm #708637AnonymousInactiveIf you login to your Neteller account you will see new terms and conditions that they require you accept before proceeding – part of these conditions state that we must acknowledge that they ARE NOT A BANK. I am more than happy to accept this , and I see this as the one light at the end of the tunnel.
October 2, 2006 at 6:40 pm #708642AnonymousInactivethey ARE NOT A BANK
Good to see someone fighting back. After the new legislation, companies all over the world are accepting more than the bill carries by itself. This thing of US law being World law does not make any sense to me. In my view the bill may affect gambling companies because of less US citizens playing but I don’t see any need for statements like “we will not accept any gambling by US citizens” since they are based outside US jurisdiction.
-
AuthorPosts