- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
You are correct, in the long run age and popularity rule.
However, you need a path to get there and that is when you worry about SEO so you can grab visitors and become popular.
Very old and popular sites need no SEO, or very little of it.
This is what I was looking for! That makes sense. I also noticed that they use .gov search sites to link to theirselves as well which I suspect are their own as well. Seems to me they have been around a long time on the internet in other areas besides gambling and have used that to their advantage.
Who-ever owns this site is very knowledgable
I agree. And a long list of sites to draw quality links from I think as well.
Alright… I understand.
webber286 wrote:Greek, the idea of re-directing to another page is risky if Google finds out about it. They don’t like redirects of this nature and will ban sites for it.KW, to answer your question directly, PR only has to do with inbound links. Keyword optimization has to do with the anchor text of the incoming links and the on-page copy and the way it is arranged. The rest of this discussion is really about the position of this site in the SERPS, which has to do with many factors, PR, inbound links, age of site, etc.
I know better not to screw around with google. But not to long ago I had 500,000 inbounds coming from one search engine sitepage.nl all were scraping or doing something with my site. So what I finally contacted the owner of this Dutch search engine and explained the problems possible outcomes. I requested he redirect these sites to mine. After days of debate He did. He could not do all of them because of the amount. But now the inbounds average around 20,000 and I got some free traffic to boot. This happened on yahoo only their drunken bot can’t figure this stuff out.
