- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 29, 2006 at 4:45 pm #599120AnonymousInactive
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/29/frist.presidency.ap/index.html
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist will not run for president in 2008, Republican officials said Wednesday, as the field of White House contenders continued to shrink more than a year before the first convention delegates are chosen.
His decision caps a 12-year stint in electoral politics in which he rose from an underdog in his 1994 Senate campaign to the position of majority leader a mere eight years later.
The decision by the Tennessee senator leaves Sen. John McCain of Arizona, Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani as the most nationally prominent contenders for the Republican nomination.
Other potential GOP contenders include Sens. Sam Brownback of Kansas and Charles Hagel of Nebraska, Gov. George Pataki of New York and Rep. Duncan Hunter of California.
Frist becomes the most high-profile campaign dropout. Earlier this fall, former Democratic Gov. Mark Warner of Virginia also announced he will not run for the presidency in 2008. Warner, like Frist, had begun putting in place a campaign organization to raise money and line up supporters in early caucus and primary states, as well as nationally.
For more than a year, Frist has been under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding allegations of insider trading in connection with the sale of shares in HCA Inc., a hospital chain and health company his father and brother founded.
Frist has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, although he has not gained the quick resolution of the issue that he had hoped for.
Frist was a physician with no experience in politics when he challenged Democratic Sen. Jim Sasser. He was swept into office in that year’s Republican landslide.
November 29, 2006 at 4:54 pm #717264vladcizsolMemberThis is excellent news Dave!
:laugh:
November 29, 2006 at 6:59 pm #717274AnonymousInactiveWell there goes the material I had for another 14 videos… :cuss: :rasberry:
November 29, 2006 at 7:41 pm #717279AnonymousInactiveI’d put my money on their pick being McCain.
Not sure what Giuliani would run on; geesh just because he happened to be the mayor on 9/11? Same with Obama for the dems; what the heck has he done?
Lets hope Frist doesnt renege on this plan.
November 30, 2006 at 12:00 am #717304AnonymousInactiveFrist obviously withdrew because of all the dirt on him. Land casino payoffs, his SEC investigation regarding his affiliation with a private hospital, etc., etc.
He knew he was dogmeat. Still, this bastard is responsible for sending our livelihoods to the shitter. I fault him, more than any of the other boneheads in this regard.
There is no way in hell he would have gotten elected anyway.
November 30, 2006 at 12:54 am #717309AnonymousInactiveI agree with you also. Now if we could only get rid of Nancy who took Indian Casino money and Harry who is in the pockets of the Vegas Casinos and who both want to ban online gambling. In fact, Nancy the other day said that the ban did not go far enough!
December 1, 2006 at 4:54 pm #717504AnonymousInactiveI have mixed feelings. Gone is the risk that that bum will become president, but I would have enjoyed voting against that S.O.B. too!
December 1, 2006 at 10:28 pm #717553AnonymousInactivebleuze wrote:I agree with you also. Now if we could only get rid of Nancy who took Indian Casino money and Harry who is in the pockets of the Vegas Casinos and who both want to ban online gambling. In fact, Nancy the other day said that the ban did not go far enough!What makes you think that Harry wants to ban online gambling?
As to Frist, he realized that he wouldn’t make it. First, he left the Senate, because he realized that he wouldn’t get reelected. Now, he’s realized that he lacks the national name required to make it out of the Republican primary.
January 12, 2007 at 10:37 pm #722350AnonymousInactiveYou guys just dont get it.
Our new speaker of the house, extreem left wing democrate Nance Polosi personally wrote me ( I mentioned this in here before) ) and she is 100 % for the BAN on gambling, 100% for the BAN ON GAMBLING. DO you get it, A left wing democrate , with the 3rd highest job in the US government is 100% for the BAN on gambling.
GEEZ man, if you all spent more time getting to the real reason the ban is in effect, maybe we can do something about it, but most of you , ah, you’ll never get it.
January 12, 2007 at 10:49 pm #722353AnonymousInactivebud405n wrote:You guys just dont get it.I get it.
Polosi is a huge threat, but probably won’t get her personal agenda perpetuated unless we need a tie-breaker… even then at that, the House is just 50% of the process. You know that it’s more complex than just her beliefs.
Also, even if she’s 100% for the ban, is online gambling one of her platforms? She may have strong feelings about it, but decide to focus on other issues.
I will be happy to cover this on a webcast… do you still have the letter/email?
Thanks…
January 13, 2007 at 7:57 pm #722450AnonymousInactiveThe only letter I saved was the one from Barbra Boxer and all she did was dance around the issue. As much as I dissagree with everything that Polosi sayd and does at least she is up front about it.
What I will do though is I will email her a question and kind of frame it like ” now that your in such a high position, will you at least try and take the online wager part out of the safe ports act and give it a fair chance for an up or down vote.
I dont know if her stance on that will be as strong as her last stance when I just posed the question how whould you vote on the issue, but after all, I think what all of us in this forum want is a fair shake on the issue.
Airing our concerns in here is one thing, but I still say, enough with the same ole same ole bs bad mouthing a whole group because of a few wackos, (I too am disgusted with Frist and so glad he not running, well he id running, runing away, but hey, lets put out efforts in writting out house people, we got what we want, democrates in power, thats all I heard, lets get the dems in. Well, lets let them help us and no make any excuses for anything. Write them.
No spell check here, gonna go and try and help myself and all of you by writting someone in a party that all of you told me would help us, come on guys, get to typing.
PS I just want to add, this is nothing personal against you or anyone in here, Im with you guys/gals, I have a gaming website too. My thoughs are only , if we are to win we cant afford to be like sheep and just follow what we read on the net or in bias news papers. I happen to be a libertian and in most cases vote that way. I would bet most people didnt even know that the new speaker is completly against making gaming legal, so he we are still blasting Frist, when what good is that doing, now that the dems are in , lets get going, that my only intention. If I offended anyone, Im sorry.
January 13, 2007 at 8:12 pm #722451AnonymousInactiveWell, too bad you don’t have that old letter from Pelosi…:unhappy:
APCW will do whatever we can… public or private… to combat this corrupted system that has taken so much from us.
See you all on the battlefield…
-
AuthorPosts