Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Founders of Neteller Arrested!

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 119 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #722888
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Since we are all giving our thoughts here is mine…….

    The big guys in Vegas smell blood and they are going in for the kill:fencing:

    #722889
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    fonzi wrote:
    U.S. CHARGES TWO FOUNDERS OF PAYMENT SERVICES COMPANY
    WITH LAUNDERING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF
    INTERNET GAMBLING PROCEEDS

    MICHAEL J. GARCIA, the United States Attorney for the
    Southern District of New York, and MARK J. MERSHON, the Assistant
    Director-in-Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of
    Investigation (“FBI”), announced today that STEPHEN ERIC LAWRENCE
    and JOHN DAVID LEFEBVRE were arrested yesterday in connection with
    the creation and operation of an internet payment services company
    that facilitated the transfer of billions of dollars of illegal
    gambling proceeds from United States citizens to the owners of
    various internet gambling companies located overseas. According to
    the two criminal Complaints unsealed yesterday:

    Read the rest at http://www.gambling911.com

    Now I’m amazed that this wide ranging indicment doesn’t also include the US founding fathers, and their decendants for actually creating the American dollar – thus setting in motion the chain of events that would lead to US citizen wan’t to play off-shore .

    Surely they could have seen what was obviously going to happen ???
    :hehe:

    #722890
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yes, the arrests are based on obscuring the ultimate destination of funds transfers (which is indeed illegal under US money laundering laws) for the purpose of illegal sports betting (which is a criminal activity under the wire act). These arrests are not directly related to the unlawful internet gambling enforcement act.

    Our editorial staff at Casino City has been busy researching this story all day. We have links to the actual arrest warrants, to the government press release, and the stories we have written are posted on the following thread in the GPWA forums: http://www.gpwa.net/forum/showthread.php?t=169144.

    I will also be posting additional commentary on my views of the arrests on that thread later this evening.

    Michael Corfman
    Casino City

    #722891
    vladcizsol
    Member

    The charges being leveled by the US are very serious and I would imagine that UK authorities will cooperate in seizing data or financial records if asked to do so.

    The DOJ can also subpeona major US banks and financial institutions to report all transactions involving Neteller as they are tagging these as “money laundering” violations and subject to RICO and Patriot Act investigations.
    These include transactions prior to Oct 13th 2006.

    #722892
    vladcizsol
    Member

    Here is a copy of the complaint:

    Part 1

    Quote:
    CHRISTOPHER P. CONNIFF
    TIMOTHY J. TREANOR
    Assistant United States Attorneys
    Before: HONORABLE DEBRA C. FREEMAN
    United States Magistrate Judge
    Southern District of New York

    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v- STEPHEN ERIC LAWRENCE, Defendant.
    Sealed Complaint
    Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956
    COUNTY OF OFFENSE:
    NEW YORK/WESTCHESTER
    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – x
    SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, ss.:
    Maryann Goldman, being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and charges as follows:

    COUNT ONE
    1. From in or about June 1999, up to and including in or about January 2007, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, STEPHEN ERIC LAWRENCE, the defendant, and others known and unknown, unlawfully, wilfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to violate Section 1956(a)(2)(A) of Title 18, United States Code.

    2. It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that STEPHEN ERIC LAWRENCE, the defendant, and others known and unknown, would and did transport, transmit, and transfer monetary instruments and funds from a place in the United States to and through a place outside the United States and to a place in the United States from and through a place outside the United States with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity, to wit, the operation of illegal gambling businesses in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1955, the illegal transmission of wagers and gambling information, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1084, and the commission of gambling
    offenses in violation of both New York State Penal Law, Article 225, and
    anti-gambling statutes in other states.

    OVERT ACTS
    3. In furtherance of said conspiracy and to effect the illegal object thereof,
    STEPHEN ERIC LAWRENCE, the defendant, and others known and unknown, committed the following overt acts, among others, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere:

    a. In or about 1999, LAWRENCE and a co-conspirator (“CC#1”) founded a group of businesses (the “Neteller Group”) to provide online payment services to internet gambling businesses.

    b. Beginning in or about July 2000, and continuing up to in or about December 2003, LAWRENCE, CC#1, and others affiliated with the Neteller Group offered online payment services through Neteller Inc., a Canadian corporation, to various internet gambling businesses so that these businesses could illegally access customers in the United States, including customers in and around New York City.

    c. Beginning in or about January 2004, and continuing up to in or about January 2007, LAWRENCE, CC#1, and others affiliated with the Neteller Group offered online payment services through Neteller PLC, a corporation based in the Isle of Man, to various internet gambling businesses so that these businesses could illegally access customers in the United States, including in and around New York City.

    d. On or about April 14, 2004, LAWRENCE, CC#1, and others affiliated with the
    Neteller Group raised approximately $70 million through an initial public
    offering of shares in Neteller PLC on the Alternative Investment Market (“AIM”)
    of the London Stock Exchange (“LSE”) in order to, among other things, expand
    their online payment business. (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(h).) The bases for deponent’s knowledge and for the foregoing charge are, in part, as follows:

    4. Since in or about June 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) has
    been conducting an investigation of Neteller PLC, a company that is based in
    Isle of Man and is publicly-traded in the United Kingdom. The investigation has
    revealed that Neteller PLC conducts and facilitates illegal financial transactions between gambling customers in the United States and numerous
    offshore online gambling businesses.

    5. I have been personally involved in the investigation of this matter. This
    complaint is based upon my involvement in the investigation, my conversations with other law enforcement officials and witnesses, and my examination of reports, records, and tapes. Because this complaint is being submitted for the limited purpose of establishing probable cause, it does not include all the facts that I have learned during the course of this investigation. Where the contents of documents and the actions, statements, and conversations of others are reported herein, they are reported in substance and in part, except where otherwise indicated.

    6. I have reviewed various business records of Neteller PLC. These records
    describe, among other things, the history and development of the Neteller Group and the services that it provides. For example, in the prospectus from Neteller PLC’s initial public offering on the AIM (the “Neteller IPO Prospectus”), the Board of Directors of Neteller PLC, including STEPHEN ERIC LAWRENCE, the defendant, collectively states that Neteller Inc., a Canadian corporation, was founded in 1999 by LAWRENCE and CC#1; that on January 1, 2004, the Neteller Group began doing business as Neteller PLC, a corporation based in Isle of Man; that Neteller PLC specializes in providing online payment processing services to online merchants and customers; that Neteller PLC, and previously Neteller Inc., offers services through Neteller.com; that the primary service provided by Neteller PLC, and previously by Neteller Inc., is a “virtual wallet” account that enables customers to deposit, withdraw, or transfer funds with any merchant
    that supports the Neteller online payments system; that Neteller PLC generates its revenues on a fee-for-service basis for any transfer of money between any combination of members or merchants; and that Neteller Inc. began processing transactions in July 2000.

    7. I have reviewed various business records of Neteller PLC that provide
    information regarding the scope of the online payment services provided by
    Neteller PLC, including the following:

    a. In the Neteller IPO Prospectus, the Board of Directors of Neteller PLC,
    including STEPHEN ERIC LAWRENCE, the defendant, collectively states that more than 95 percent of the revenues generated by the Neteller Group, is derived from processing money transfers pertaining to the online gambling market; and that on or about March 1, 2004, Neteller PLC had 685,945 member accounts, of which approximately 88 percent belonged to North American residents.

    b. Neteller PLC’s 2004 annual report states that, in 2004, Neteller PLC
    processed $3.4 billion in financial transactions; and Neteller PLC provides
    gambling customers with access to more than 80 percent of the online gaming
    merchants in the world.

    c. Neteller PLC’s 2005 annual report states that, in 2005, Neteller PLC
    processed over $7.3 billion in financial transactions; Neteller PLC provides
    gambling customers with access to more than 80 percent of worldwide gaming
    merchants; and in 2005, Neteller PLC had $172.1 million in revenues and $91.5
    million in net profit.

    d. In Neteller PLC’s half yearly report for the six-month period ending June 30,
    2006, dated September 11, 2006, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
    Neteller PLC described the “online gaming market” as Neteller PLC’s “main
    market,” and stated that, in the first half of 2006, Neteller PLC processed $5.1
    billion in financial transactions, and that approximately 85 percent of Neteller
    PLC’s revenue during that period derived from individuals in North America.
    e. The transcript of a public conference call that occurred on or about
    September 11, 2006, between officers of Neteller PLC and financial analysts,
    reflects that the Chief Financial Officer of Neteller PLC stated during the
    conference call that approximately 75 percent of the revenue of Neteller PLC
    originated from customers in the United States.

    8. As part of the investigation, law enforcement officers and a cooperating
    witness posed as gambling customers and conducted online monetary transactions with numerous online gambling businesses using online payment processing services provided by Neteller PLC. The following are examples of some of the transactions that I have either participated in or learned about:

    a. On or about August 12, 2006, a cooperating witness (the “CW”), who at the time was located in Miami, Florida, used a computer to open an account on Neteller.com (the “Neteller Account”), and the CW electronically transferred $400 from a bank account in Miami, Florida, into the Neteller Account. On or about August 22, 2006, the CW, who at the time was located in Miami, Florida, used a computer to open a wagering account with an online gambling business based in Antigua (“Online Gambling Business #1), by electronically transferring $400 from the Neteller Account to Online Gambling Business #1. On or about August 24, 2006, the CW, who at the time was located in Miami, Florida, used a computer to access Online Gambling Business #1’s website, and the CW then wagered $250 on a National Football League (“NFL”) football game and won approximately $200. On or about September 7, 2006, the CW, who at the time was located in Miami, Florida, used a computer to access Online Gambling Business #1’s website, and the CW then wagered $250 on an NFL football game and lost $250.

    b. On or about September 26, 2006, I was present with the CW at a public library located in Westchester County, New York. At that time, I observed the CW access the internet using a public computer at the library. The CW then used the computer to access Online Gambling Business #1’s website, and the CW then withdrew $200 from his wagering account with Online Gambling Business #1 and transferred it electronically to the Neteller Account. Thereafter, the CW then placed a $50 wager on an NFL football game on Online Gambling Business #1’s website using money that had previously been deposited with Online Gambling Business #1 using the Neteller Account.

    c. On or about December 29, 2006, in Westchester County, New York, I used a computer to access the Neteller Account by logging on to Neteller.com. At that time, the balance in the account was $100. I then transferred $25 from the Neteller Account to a wagering account with an online gambling business based in Costa Rica (“Online Gambling Business #2”). I then transferred $25 from the Neteller account to a wagering account with another online gambling business based in Costa Rica (“Online Gambling Business #3”). Then, I logged on to Online Gambling Business #1’s website and used a link to Neteller.com to transfer $25 from the Neteller Account to the wagering account with Online Gambling Business #1 that previously had been opened by the CW.

    #722894
    vladcizsol
    Member

    Part 2 of the Neteller complaint

    Quote:
    9. I have reviewed various business records obtained from financial institutions that provide information regarding international monetary transactions conducted by, or on behalf of, Neteller PLC, including the following:

    a. Records of automated clearinghouse (“ACH”) transactions obtained pursuant to subpoena from an automated clearinghouse located in the United States demonstrate that Neteller processes a significant amount of customer
    transactions through the automated clearinghouse system, including transactions from customers in Manhattan. The ACH system permits Neteller to handle internet-based customer transactions. These records further demonstrate that Neteller uses a payment service company (the “Payment Company”) to conduct its customers’ ACH transactions in the name of the Payment Company. By doing so, Neteller PLC conceals the nature of these financial transactions. The Payment Company receives funds in the United States on behalf of Neteller PLC, and then transfers the funds out of the United States to accounts controlled by Neteller PLC in Canada.

    b. Records of wire transfers obtained pursuant to subpoena from a bank in the
    United States (the “US Bank”) demonstrate that, from in or about January 2006 up to and including in or about March 2006, a total of approximately $98 million was transferred by wire from an account in the name of the Payment Company at the US Bank in the United States to an account in the name of JSL Systems Inc. at National Bank of Canada in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Neteller PLC’s 2004 annual report states that JSL Systems Inc. is a related company that is owned by a director of Neteller PLC that processes transactions for Neteller PLC and is paid a nominal fee for its services. In the Neteller IPO Prospectus, the Board of Directors of Neteller PLC, including STEPHEN ERIC LAWRENCE, the defendant, collectively states that LAWRENCE and CC#1 are partners in and/or directors of JSL Systems Inc.

    c. Records of wire transfers obtained pursuant to subpoena from the US Bank
    demonstrate that, from in or about March 2006 up to and including in or about
    April 2006, a total of approximately $50 million was transferred from an account in the name of the Payment Company at the US Bank in the United States to an account in the name of Cardload Inc. at National Bank of Canada in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Neteller PLC’s 2004 annual report states that Cardload Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Neteller PLC.

    10. I have reviewed various business records of Neteller PLC that provide
    information regarding the involvement of STEPHEN ERIC LAWRENCE, the defendant, in the business affairs of Neteller Inc. and Neteller PLC, including the following:

    a. In the Neteller IPO Prospectus, the Board of Directors of Neteller PLC,
    including LAWRENCE, collectively states the following: LAWRENCE founded the
    Neteller Group in June 1999; LAWRENCE participated in developing the online
    payment services of the Neteller Group and participated in raising capital for
    the Neteller Group; LAWRENCE served as Chief Executive Officer of Neteller Inc. until December 2002 and drew a salary and other compensation from Neteller Inc.; LAWRENCE served as executive director of Neteller Inc. from 2001 to August 31, 2003; LAWRENCE was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Neteller PLC and would continue to serve as Chairman upon admission of Neteller PLC to AIM; LAWRENCE owned approximately 42 percent of Neteller PLC prior to the IPO, and LAWRENCE would own approximately 36 percent of Neteller PLC after the IPO; and LAWRENCE advanced to Neteller PLC approximately $3 million in an interest-free loan.

    b. Neteller PLC’s 2004 annual report states that Neteller PLC is the creation of
    LAWRENCE who is a major shareholder of Neteller PLC; LAWRENCE served as Chief Executive Officer of Neteller Inc. until December 2002; throughout 2004,
    LAWRENCE was the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Neteller PLC; on or about December 31, 2004, LAWRENCE was the largest shareholder of Neteller PLC, owning 21.94% percent of the outstanding shares of Neteller PLC; and during 2004, the Board of Directors of Neteller PLC granted LAWRENCE options to purchase additional shares of Neteller PLC.

    c. Neteller PLC’s 2005 annual report states that LAWRENCE served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Neteller PLC during 2005, but that LAWRENCE would step down from his position as Chairman at Neteller PLC’s annual general meeting in 2006; during 2005, the Board of Directors of Neteller PLC granted LAWRENCE options to purchase additional shares of Neteller PLC; and during 2005, Neteller PLC paid LAWRENCE compensation for serving as a director.

    11. I have reviewed various business records of Neteller PLC that demonstrate
    that STEPHEN ERIC LAWRENCE, the defendant, had knowledge that he was
    participating in criminal activity in the United States. For example, in the
    Neteller IPO Prospectus, the Board of Directors of Neteller PLC, including
    LAWRENCE, collectively states that criminal laws exist in the United States that prohibit persons from promoting certain forms of gambling; criminal laws exist in the United States that prohibit the transmission of funds that are known to have been derived from criminal activity or are intended to promote criminal activity; that to date most of the criminal prosecutions related to online gambling in the United States have been limited to cases where assets or relevant individuals are located in the United States; that the Neteller Group does not maintain offices or assets in the United States; and that there can be no assurance that the government of the United States will not try to prosecute the Neteller Group under existing or future federal laws. WHEREFORE, deponent prays that a warrant be issued for the arrest of the above-named individual and that he be arrested and imprisoned or bailed as the case may be.
    ________________________________
    MARYANN GOLDMAN
    SPECIAL AGENT
    FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
    Sworn to before me this day of January 16, 2007
    ________________________________
    UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
    SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

    #722896
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    From what I have read:

    Some guy transfered money to a foreign e-wallet – so far nothing illegal.
    The e-wallet transfered money to a gambling website – nothing illegal, it is allowed where the e-wallet is based.

    I hope the “hippie” will fight the system – he has a pretty good chance.

    #722899
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    My prediction is that the US government will attempt to squeeze the defendants by freezing the funds in thier possession since they were acquired from the proceeds of ‘money laundering’. Let’s hope the Bahamas does not cooperate with the US government.

    They’ll then drag it in court as long as they can wasting your tax dollars.

    #722900
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    My prediction is that the US government will attempt to squeeze the defendants

    I bet they have their top guys working on this – very hollow charges, you might as well charge the Federal Reserve for printing the money used to gamble onilne.

    It’s like pressing charges against an Amsterdam cofeshop for selling a joint to an American toursit. Hey, it’s illegal in the US but not where the cofeshop is based.

    P.S. I dont think they keep their assets where USDOJ can reach them :D

    #722908
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It begins…

    starsbi8.jpg

    #722911
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yikes is that image correct? It certainly looks legit. Hey you know what you hypocritical politicians regulate this :Pisser:

    greek39

    #722945
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hi all,

    no answers here, just had to laugh.

    You guys would be hard pressed to beat France.

    Good one Lou.

    #722947
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think so – I saw it at poker affiliate world.:shooter:

    #722973
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Casino City wrote:
    Yes, the arrests are based on obscuring the ultimate destination of funds transfers (which is indeed illegal under US money laundering laws) for the purpose of illegal sports betting (which is a criminal activity under the wire act). These arrests are not directly related to the unlawful internet gambling enforcement act.
    Michael Corfman
    Casino City

    I agree with this.

    All the arrests that stuck in the past were related to illegal sportsbetting, and this one adds hiding the destination of money transfers.

    It is indeed a blow to the industry to lose neteller.

    I just hope the casinos haven’t been asleep on the switch and have an alternative.

    #722975
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Dominique wrote:
    I just hope the casinos haven’t been asleep on the switch and have an alternative.
    So do I – but in the couple that I’ve discussed this with over the last 1-2 months (trying to understand deposit strategy) there seemed to be a HUGE hole in their planning on this.

    Either they were keeping their plan closely under wraps …
    Or there isn’t a plan B right now …
    :Ohno:

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 119 total)