- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 2, 2008 at 1:39 pm #780712ZlzmbmaxMemberallfreechips;178740 wrote:someone who will go after anyone doing the wrong thing in washington.
Just as long as nobody looks too hard at what she might have done wrong in a town in Alaska :hattip:
October 2, 2008 at 1:39 pm #780713AnonymousInactive@allfreechips 178740 wrote:
No im looking at someone who will go after anyone doing the wrong thing in washington, none are perfect but she scores the highest.
Well to bad she is to dumb to figure out a way to not waste earmarked money in her own state on crap like the ROAD TO NOWHERE.
Have you heard about that? $21 Million dollars used for the three-mile road that is sitting there un-used?
October 2, 2008 at 1:54 pm #780717AnonymousInactiveOK, there is not a one person running that hasnt done the same or worse, like I said im looking at the best, not the perfect one lol. Huckaby or Paul would have been worlds better than all these people.
October 2, 2008 at 1:56 pm #780718ZlzmbmaxMemberOctober 2, 2008 at 2:13 pm #780719AnonymousInactive@allfreechips 178748 wrote:
Huckaby or Paul would have been worlds better than all these people.
I recently watched Huckabee’s new show this week and it was ok, but I hope he can be a little less bias in his new role. I don’t know much about him, so I can’t say more than that.
As far as wasting tax dollars, you are right that others do the same, but my point is that you don’t see them on TV saying how they said “thanks, but no thanks” and then are shown to be a liar when it’s revealed that she was for the Bridge to NoWhere until it was no longer popular and exposed as a bad idea. Not very smart IMO.
October 2, 2008 at 3:17 pm #780725AnonymousInactive@GamTrak 178750 wrote:
I recently watched Huckabee’s new show this week and it was ok, but I hope he can be a little less bias in his new role. I don’t know much about him, so I can’t say more than that.
As far as wasting tax dollars, you are right that others do the same, but my point is that you don’t see them on TV saying how they said “thanks, but no thanks” and then are shown to be a liar when it’s revealed that she was for the Bridge to NoWhere until it was no longer popular and exposed as a bad idea. Not very smart IMO.
I’ll stick with the assessment I made in posts last month that she is an amateur.
http://www.casinoaffiliateprograms.com/bb/key-republican-admits-palin-not-qualified.29843.htmMany of those answers are proving me right so far, but she may do great in tonight’s debate. She seems to do better on the stump when you can say things like ” thanks but no thanks” and talk in generalities. Like I said McCain may regret picking her. Tonight will tell.
Her lack of experience and knowledge really shows but maybe it was all a big setup and she’s a world class debater.
-
AuthorPosts