- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 24, 2006 at 7:23 pm #593903AnonymousInactive
Hello,
I don’t know whether this is the part of the forum intended fot his message but check this out:
I was looking for dutch competitors and found this site:
xhttp://www.casinoaffiliates.nl/everything is translated into dutch, so no real content scraping, but it is obviously copied from CAP.
He’s only having 8 visitors a day, but just wanted to let you know.
PJ
April 24, 2006 at 7:25 pm #689858AnonymousInactiveGood spot! That is so blatant its pathetic! Scraping is such a bad term for theft. We need a better word – “plagiarising” perhaps?
April 24, 2006 at 7:33 pm #689859AnonymousInactiveIf we are looking for a simple, short word for ‘theft’, then we could perhaps use the word ‘theft’ itself
I mean… ‘plagiarising’:banger:
It’s a bless to be educated but their is no need to make things complicated heresigh.gifApril 24, 2006 at 7:40 pm #689863AnonymousInactivecasinoreports wrote:If we are looking for a simple, short word for ‘theft’, then we could perhaps use the word ‘theft’ itselfI mean… ‘plagiarising’:banger:
It’s a bless to be educated but their is no need to make things complicated heresigh.gifOoh “theft” ! Why didnt i think of that
Anyway…bit of detective work:
There are no affiliate links or subpages – looks like its been set up as a doorway page. However it links to three other sites. One of these is called “speltips.nl”. The whois info for that is identical to the “thefted” site (anonymous via ISP). So looks like the same guy.
So now go to xhttp://www.speltips.nl/casino.html and you get his affiliate links (oohhh, 888, how topical).
His(her) Casino Rewards Aff ID is “aff40611” and his 888 ID is “362229”, if that helps. There you go – couple of emails to the affiliate managers and they should xfer his earnings to you Prof
It also links to “gokkasten-pagina.nl” but this simply redirects to Cherry Games. However there is full Whois info incl. name (and different host) on that one so it may be separet, or it may tie in with what the Aff programs have as a name.
Cheers
Simmo!
April 24, 2006 at 8:03 pm #689865vladcizsolMemberThanks guys we will get the legal team on this.
What an asshole this person is! :flamer:
April 24, 2006 at 8:20 pm #689869AnonymousInactiveI agree this is not scraping, we really need to be accurate in our descriptions and not confuse techniques.
I don’t speak dutch so I am not so sure it’s theft either; babelfish returned text that wasn’t an exact match. It look’s like the site may have been inspired by CAP, but after a quick glance I don’t see anything stolen, I didn’t look around though.
April 24, 2006 at 9:37 pm #689889AnonymousInactiveim investigating it
no hard proves yetApril 24, 2006 at 9:40 pm #689890AnonymousInactiveResultaat voor speltips.nl
Domeinnaam speltips.nl (eerste domein)
Status actiefRegistrant BudgetHosting
Ambachtsmark 1
1355 EA ALMERE
Netherlands
Domicilie N/A
Gebonden aan ADR ja
Administratief contact O Vrijburg
+31 (0)36-5382142
info@budgethosting.nlRegistrar BudgetHosting /d *)
Nijvergouw 13
1352 CB ALMERE
NetherlandsTechnisch contact O Vrijburg
+31 (0)36-5382142
info@budgethosting.nl
Technisch contact Onno Vrijburg
+31 (0)365405361
onno@resolve-it.nlNameserver ns1.namelessnet.com 62.212.91.134
Nameserver ns3.namelessnet.com 62.212.91.140
Nameserver ns5.namelessnet.com 83.96.133.70Datum registratie 14-04-2005
Record laatst gewijzigd 18-10-2005
Record onderhouden door NL Domain RegistryApril 24, 2006 at 9:43 pm #689892AnonymousInactiveDomeinnaam casinoaffiliates.nl (eerste domein)
Status actiefRegistrant BudgetHosting
Ambachtsmark 1
1355 EA ALMERE
Netherlands
Domicilie N/A
Gebonden aan ADR ja
Administratief contact O Vrijburg
+31 (0)36-5382142
info@budgethosting.nlRegistrar BudgetHosting /d *)
Nijvergouw 13
1352 CB ALMERE
NetherlandsTechnisch contact O Vrijburg
+31 (0)36-5382142
info@budgethosting.nl
Technisch contact Onno Vrijburg
+31 (0)365405361
onno@resolve-it.nlNameserver ns1.namelessnet.com 62.212.91.134
Nameserver ns3.namelessnet.com 62.212.91.140
Nameserver ns5.namelessnet.com 83.96.133.70Datum registratie 19-05-2005
Record laatst gewijzigd 18-10-2005
Record onderhouden door NL Domain RegistryApril 24, 2006 at 10:31 pm #689898AnonymousInactivehe is posting on this forum and living in Rotterdam
http://www.kansspelforum.com/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=5i know the owner of this forum, a good guy
April 24, 2006 at 11:29 pm #689907vladcizsolMemberThanks all. :cheers:
We have reached him and he has promised to change the site. We will be watching him closely to ensure that happens.
April 25, 2006 at 12:26 am #689912AnonymousInactiveaxl wrote:I agree this is not scraping, we really need to be accurate in our descriptions and not confuse techniques.I don’t speak dutch so I am not so sure it’s theft either; babelfish returned text that wasn’t an exact match. It look’s like the site may have been inspired by CAP, but after a quick glance I don’t see anything stolen, I didn’t look around though.
allright, I did mess up the descriptions for the techniques apparently.
And because I was’nt really sure whether copying layouts is scraping (I’m a newbie..), I added the sentence “everything is translated into dutch, so no real content scraping, but it is obviously copied from CAP.”.
Just to let you know that I don’t want to call someone a scraper if he’s not.
However, I am surprised that you say: “It look’s like the site may have been inspired by CAP, but after a quick glance I don’t see anything stolen.”
Do you mean that it is “accepted” to copy a site’s layout, if you just change the content? Because to me the site looks quite a bit like CAP. There are probably a couple of things changed, but the ‘general first impression’ is the same.
But if it’s ‘legal’ or ‘ok’ to copy ans semi paste some one’s layout, then just tell me as I don’t know yet, I’ll take notice of it.
To me, it just seemed unethical, unfair, … you know.
Greetz,
PJ
April 25, 2006 at 12:47 am #689914AnonymousInactiveThats ok, I seen you had stated it wasnt really scraping, just wanted voice my opinion that we needed to be careful with that terminology.
Layouts/templates are a dime a dozen, unless its something ground breaking that is totally unique to just one site, I doubt a simple layout would be protected by copyright laws.
I had looked at the coding, it was different. Both used shades of greens, but the colors are different, the graphics were different. The logos are similar but not the same; heck look at CAPS spring break logo; it too was inspired by another very well known logo.
I do agree the webmaster could have done a better job choosing his layout and color scheme, but calling him a thief might be going a bit far, he is simply an idiot in my opinion.
April 25, 2006 at 7:58 am #689951AnonymousInactiveaxl wrote:…but calling him a thief might be going a bit far, he is simply an idiot in my opinion.:laugh: very good :laugh:
April 25, 2006 at 3:00 pm #689976AnonymousInactiveReading this, at first made me think that I didn´t understand the concept of scraping. Turns out this isn´t a scrape. Just some fool being a tad too blatant in his “web design efforts”.
I don´t think the professor can expect any money from him though because he won´t have made any with this dump.
-
AuthorPosts