Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Breaking news expected

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 5 posts - 76 through 80 (of 80 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #671623
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Interesting how quick RB forgets the hands that have fed them since the

    beginning and put them where they are today … if they want new

    markets that’s what affiliates are for !

    #671625
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Prof If this is private info or if u cant check dont reply – but does anyone from referback regularly check in and see the replies to their rediculous comments and statements, as it would appear they simply post then run, I would feel a little better if they do log in frequently to asses the damage so to speak?

    #671632
    vladcizsol
    Member

    There are three or four different Referback people who cruise through here at least four times a day each. They see the discussions, they run back to their manager Leith and she tells them not to respond. Shes a worthless hag.

    #671698
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ok everyone. The deadline is fast approaching. But I am already resigned to the fact that we will have to take action against the two largest programs, Fortune and Referback.

    I am gathering the remaining little bits of information as I speak – any of you who have the previous T&Cs please post in the other thread so I can get at it from one place.

    Those of you who have graciously offered to assist with legal costs, I will be contacting you soon with further information. I am hopeful that we won’t need to spend much as I smell lawyers ready to fight tooth and nail to get these cases on contingency – but better to have some resources ready to go just the same.

    Anyone who wants to ask their lawyer about the issue at hand, this is the question:

    Quote:
    In a situation where Party A unilaterally makes a change to that contract with respect to the calculation of commissions on players delivered by Party B, and for which Party B clearly has a vested interest, and this change and calculation is clearly to the detriment of Party B, and Party B has not assented to this change, which party would be likely to prevail in a court of law in (choose appropriate location)?

    You can choose any location you like, but I am reasonably certain that, with the right amount of proof, the answer will be the same in nearly every instance – and we really only need one judgement to deliver the message.

    Lastly – your magic words from here on in – and make sure everyone hears you saying it:

    One magic word – AUDIT – what every business, including affiliate programs, should be subjected to.

    Two magic words – VESTED INTEREST – meaning you have a a right to be notified and consulted any time a change to this VESTED INTEREST (players) is made which will negatively impact your interest.

    Three magic words – UNILATERAL RETROACTIVE APPLICATION – means you got screwed in the rear without your permission.

    The first one is potentially the most powerful – the very LAST thing these programs want is to be AUDITED.

    The other sets of words are the words which will ultimately deliver the judgement in our favor.

    #671701
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am perfectly willing to invest some money in the future of this business.

    Without being able to trust in the validity of contracts and deals there is no future.

    money4.gif

    Just tell me the neteller address and timing.

    Mass instances of UNILATERAL RETROACTIVE APPLICATION are not in my repertoire of desireable situations.

Viewing 5 posts - 76 through 80 (of 80 total)