- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 18, 2008 at 9:53 pm #610510LucretiaMember
trafficlabel ‘s sites copy your content just a few lines or paragraphs
and alter a few words : i have original content for multiple sites!copycat casino-junkie.com
http://www.casino-junkie.com/welcomebonus/
search for the lines starting at :
Any kind of bonus sounds………..
and you will find a other site in google search results……….
Imagine 1000’s of sites with your paragraphs copied……….
Webmaster needs proof he copied that content……..:sarcasm:
Some webmasters have ABSOLUTELY no manners or ethics…….
What do you think ??
R.
BTW
http://www.casino-junkie.com/nodepositebonus/
is now offline thank G.:wink-wink
August 19, 2008 at 9:59 am #776070hhyipstats111MemberYes some webmasters don’t have manners or ethics. It’s easy to misbehave online. I honestly belive 50% of the webmasters who copy content dont understant what they are doing.
Also downloading piracy stuff from the web is same thing than robbing from the store, but it dont feels like it…
August 19, 2008 at 12:28 pm #776082AnonymousInactiveWhat annoys me the most is that the affiliate programs do not act accordingly..
Warnings do not work… closing the accounts and banning them from signing up again is the way to go..
There would be no reason to copy sites if it was impossible to earn money in the industry.. It is so logical …
August 19, 2008 at 4:52 pm #776115LucretiaMemberhere are some examples from the trafficlabel content copies :
I emailed this webmaster and it seemed he did not care at all he probably owns 100’s of sites with copied content
xxhttp://www.casinoaffiliateprograms.com/bb/showthread.php?p=172834#post172834
other found copies :
original
xxhttp://www.casinogamblingweb.com/main/free-casino-games/index.jsp (webmaster is notified)
copycat
xxhttp://gambleforums.net/freeonlinecasinogames/
xxhttp://www.casinogamblingweb.com/main/free-casino-games/index.jsp
the copycat
xxhttp://gambleforums.net/freeonlinecasinogames/
Shall I go on ? These COPYCATS are ALL trafficlabel !!!
His (Affclub) affiliate account must be closed because this is the only remedy for this, just “cooperating” and removing the copies found is not enough, this one will go on for sure if you let him!!
Please some input from other CAP members because i can not do it all by myself.
If this account will not be closed i will remove affclub content permanently, i need programs acting fast on misbehaviour because this has not happend once not twice but more than three times so he had enough warnings and all were disgarded and the copycat has resumed copying content again.
What more proof is needed ?
R.
August 19, 2008 at 5:59 pm #776123AnonymousGuestagree. I’d never promote a sponsor that would allow a scum bag to take what would otherwise have been mine or yours and that’s what happens with every site that is designed by such methods.
The (poor) arguement is that since its not all from one person’s site that it isn’t really plagurism the same way it isn’t plagurism if you use one of those softwares that have you write the article with like 3 different sentences for each keypoint in your article and then it mixes up all those possible combinations to provide you with literally as many unique versions of that article as the math would allow for every group of 3 versions of the same sentence that is found in the article.
I’m no math genius (used to be pretty good though) but I would assume if an article had even just a mere 3 different intersections where the group of 3 different versions of the same sentence were added into the article that it would provide 9 unique versions of the article.
The arguement can be made that all 9 versions of the same article are unique since technically they may have enough different words to rise above the boundaries which are provided by the search engines and in truth … if they are good enough … I can see how they should be given credit for all unique articles but that’s only if they’re good enough and I don’t think too many will pursue the process if SEs install some kind of algo that picks out those mediocre articles that just barely make sense because the different sentences don’t actually blend well and read even worse.
they read … exactly like these pieced together articles go. Like they were bits thrown together hap-hazardly … because as long as that is rewarded it will continue and increase in severity.
I predict that the net will one day be nearly as tough to get something published as is the real world now … it probably won’t be that tough but you know what I’m saying. It will have to actually be good enough to be read without any wrinkles or hiccups.
-
AuthorPosts