Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

30 states want power to regulate gambling

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #588879
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    http://www.harktheherald.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=56854

    Officials want to protect states’ rights to regulate gambling

    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

    SALT LAKE CITY — Nearly 30 states are joining forces to urge the U.S. government to keep Internet gambling out of international trade agreements.

    Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff helped organize the effort by states to protect their gambling laws from actions by the World Trade Organization.

    Shurtleff and 28 other attorneys general released a letter Tuesday petitioning U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman to redouble efforts to protect the legal rights of states to ban or regulate forms of gambling.

    Their plea came after a conflicted ruling by a World Trade Organization appeals panel in April.

    The panel ruled the United States could keep some Internet gambling restrictions to “protect public morals or maintain public order.” But the same 138-page decision opened a door for Internet gambling by finding fault with a federal law regulating interstate horse racing gambling.

    The panel said the United States failed to show that the Interstate Horseracing Act was applied equally to foreign and domestic remote betting services.

    That left the Caribbean nation of Antigua and Barbuda claiming U.S. authorities must treat online casinos in the same way as traditional gambling outlets.

    Shurtleff fears the WTO decision could erode state powers to regulate gaming.

    “Antigua has no business trying to write Utah’s gambling laws. The trade representative needs to know that we have too much at stake,” Shurtleff said in a statement issued Tuesday.

    This story appeared in The Daily Herald on page A1.

    #666955
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Since we can’t really figure out who won in this WTO ruling, I guess we can look at the actions being taken since. This, along with the US sidestepping the ruling seems to indicate that maybe it did go our way.

    #666975
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It is going back to the WTO.

    And we lost, we are just not admitting it and will not comply no matter how many rulings are coming down.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)