- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 3, 2005 at 8:27 pm #589506AnonymousInactive
ChoiceGambling.com has BLACKLISTED all casinos and poker rooms represented by Fortune Affiliates.
The complete list of blacklisted casinos can be found here.
Your casinos will remain on the list until you rescind the “retroactive” aspect of your recently modified terms and conditions.
August 3, 2005 at 8:58 pm #670023AnonymousInactiveI am following suit with my blacklisted casinos page which ranks #1 in 3 engines. I am particularly unhappy with Fortune discontinuing dialogue. I was always open to dialogue.
Dave, do you mind if I copy your list to help speed things up?
August 3, 2005 at 9:16 pm #670028AnonymousInactiveDominique wrote:Dave, do you mind if I copy your list to help speed things up?Go right ahead. Everyone here is welcome to use the lists — in fact, I encourage it. All I ask is that everyone write their own paragraphs so that we don’t all get zapped for duplicate content.August 3, 2005 at 9:45 pm #670029AnonymousInactiveIt would be easier to copy that list, as I was just thinking that… So if you don’t mind I’ll jump on the band wagon. Of course not copying your original text, though… Been swamped with pulling links but feel it is VERY neccessary to make the blacklist.
August 3, 2005 at 9:50 pm #670030AnonymousInactiveWell, in a recent exchange Greg from Wager Junction says he was removing the 3 month clause and looking into the paragraph that was in breach to see if he could remove it. So I will also list him as “under review”.
August 3, 2005 at 10:05 pm #670031AnonymousInactiveJust a tip for everyone — it will be easier to copy and paste the list if you use Firefox. If you use IE, you probably won’t be able to highlight specific areas of text (this is due to my use of DIVs and CSS). Alternately, you can view the source code and grab the casino names from there.
Also, I think it could be a good thing to exchange links with other blacklist pages. Doing this will boost the PR of everyone’s blacklist page, and it will help to speed up the spidering process of the new pages. If anyone is interested in this sort of reciprocal exchange, please PM me.
August 3, 2005 at 10:45 pm #670034AnonymousInactiveVery good Engineer.
This is what everybody would like to do but didn´t.
:stirpot:edit: OT (I´m off topic today) It´s up to everyone to blacklist anybody they want. On Engineers terms, everybody like and so do I.
But to say GoldenPalace.com is blacklisted because of the naming of a baby, I don´t know. Isn´t everybody involved laughing when they collect their checks?
Well thats for everybody to decide.
:laughing:August 3, 2005 at 11:07 pm #670036AnonymousInactiveNevermind… excuse this post
August 3, 2005 at 11:14 pm #670037AnonymousInactiveBlacklists are and should be put together using one’s very best impartial personal judgement.
There are and always will be moral issues that affect us differently.
This is mine: http://www.gamesandcasino.com/blacklist.htm
and I am willing to exchange links with other blacklists. It is PR4, #2 in google, #1 in yahoo, and #1 in msn.
Please PM me and if I like your site we can exchange blacklist links.
August 25, 2005 at 10:15 am #671678AnonymousInactiveHi Tami, Marc and David!
We need an answer of some sort by close of business your time today. That answer should either promote a new solution, or else revert back to your original terms, albeit temporarily, until such time as you are ready to announce a new solution which is acceptable to all parties.
Fortune Affiliates need to be operating from a legal perspective – as opposed to one likely to be found to wrongfully impact the benefits of the vested interest affiliates have in the players they send to you.
It would pain me, and I’m sure many others, if Fortune Affiliates cannot realize this by at least moving back to the white side of the equation for the time being. But I fully intend to move forward tonight as everyone is one week past their original stated deadline.
Please, please, for everyone’s sake – do the right thing today.
August 25, 2005 at 4:10 pm #671692AnonymousInactiveSpearmaster wrote:Hi Tami, Marc and David!We need an answer of some sort by close of business your time today. That answer should either promote a new solution, or else revert back to your original terms, albeit temporarily, until such time as you are ready to announce a new solution which is acceptable to all parties.
Fortune Affiliates need to be operating from a legal perspective – as opposed to one likely to be found to wrongfully impact the benefits of the vested interest affiliates have in the players they send to you.
It would pain me, and I’m sure many others, if Fortune Affiliates cannot realize this by at least moving back to the white side of the equation for the time being. But I fully intend to move forward tonight as everyone is one week past their original stated deadline.
Please, please, for everyone’s sake – do the right thing today.
Fortune, your silence is being interpreted as unwillingness to communicate and – well – being snotty and arrogant.
You are still in breach of contract and have been for a long time now.
This is not a mtter of who makes how much money in which fashion – it is a LEGAL matter. It is a matter of trust. It is a matter of a stable industry where contracts are meaningful. It is a matter of a handshake counting as something, and a legal contract definitely being observed.
Just because this is the internet does not mean that all basics of business decency can be thrown out.
Please, do speak up and honor the contract you made with us. No one really wants war, everyone wants to mend fences. We are supposed to be partners. You don’t go back on your deal with a partner – no one will believe anything you promise anymore, contract or none.
This is about integrity of the industry, not anybody’s bottomline. First we have a decent legal environment to work in, then we deal.
August 25, 2005 at 4:13 pm #671693AnonymousInactiveI’ve already been informed that they will not be making any statements, unlike Vegas Partner who has common sense.
Thus, I am already proceeding with my plans.
August 26, 2005 at 1:50 am #671733AnonymousInactiveI think we should give Fortune Affilaites more time. They
know that this situation is really important to us and I know, they
want to make things right. We should give them some more
time. :drunk2:August 26, 2005 at 12:14 pm #671749AnonymousInactiveSpearmaster wrote:Thus, I am already proceeding with my plans.Unfortunately it has come to that.
I still hold out hope…but we do need to act.
We just can’t let this industry deteriorate to such an extent that the contracts we sign are meaningless.
August 26, 2005 at 1:54 pm #671752AnonymousInactiveI see the positive points: when I start to delete all RB links on my sites on Tuesday I can take away all FA links too, unfortunately. So I´ve to do this work only one time – for the moment :banger:
But I also made some sign ups with other programs, seems they will be the winners at least…
-
AuthorPosts