- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Hi,
I’ve long been a fan of Wagershare and have sent them a good amount of my traffic in the last couple of years. the income I saw there kept increasing as my player base continued to grow; as one would expect it to.
in the last 3 or 4 months however I have seen a fallout in income, and when I have written Tim about it: I’ve gotten no reply.
While I hope this is just a bad time endured: I am somewhat more concerned than usual due to not getting a reply from Tim. I’ve written him about this at least three times and have not received a response.
anybody else seeing a drop-off? having trouble getting replies?
like I said, I hope that I’ve just hit a bad run in the road. But it has grown time to start asking.
I also saw a drop off. I used to feature them but reduced my exposure because of it. I also dont like it how most whales somehow become fraudulent players. Seems odd.
i’m not in the same boat. i have two accounts with them, one is originally mine, and the other i bought. the one i bought has the same player still playing 6 months after i acquired the tracker and while not a major whale, he’s produced some feel-good income.
on the second, i’ve been getting more players lately than usual.
Tim and wager share have been real good to me and responsive. This month is not the best but we are moving into the summer season so I expect a bit of a drop.
Brian
I don’t like what I’m hearing. Time to find someplace else to feature. Too bad. They were once very good at retaining players and were becoming IMHO one of the top programs with the sky being the limit to their future.
Here’s a guess. I wouldn’t be surprised after getting this feedback; to hear that they are adding a new casino sometime in the next couple three months.
at least that seems to be a common denominator for when a program has a fall off like this.
And I’m really really amazed Tim has not replied to me.
what a shame. I wonder, just wonder, where a program might be if it stayed to the true: offered affs 20% with realtime stats which don’t have the all-too-common “delay” in reports, which I find to be extremely odd that some stats can be reported real time, some can not- but anyway, if a program had that to offer, and kept an “open house” policy in terms to providing whatever a “know-it-all” [ lol as I’m writing cause I like givin’ him shit ] … like Spear whatever he desires in terms of open house policy…
Well I wonder where that program would be now from the time say that J-J left RB?
If they didn’t ever change the terms under what we signed up for: and didn’t have these amazing fall-offs of income over a wide range of affs … all at the same time … and they didn’t do any of the all-too-transparent things that we have seen over the last 3-4 years from places that SHOULD have been professional enough and I know were successful enough to not have had to do such intelligence insulting crap as we have endured….
would that program be more successful than those that we all know could be the opponent’s name in the comparison table under the requirements mentioned above?
if you consider all the affs sites that these programs have had their casinos displayed on at one time or another; and also consider that many affs have come up (such as myself) from not being able to provide one player a month to doing much better… that were either mistreated or shy-ed away by the comments of their more experienced peers … and also considered that when a casino loses exposure like for instance, …. english harbour did – back in the day when you couldn’t visit an aff site without being bombared by the CC group; they were hands down the leaders IMHO and then came the fall of Rome and if you ask me although the software change was a large part, i think that also a big factor in the fall from grace was the fact that almost suddenly, in about a 4 – 6 month’s time, these casinos went from being the most seen to being almost never seen.
Don’t tell me that doesn’t send huge signals to players because I know it did me. In fact I remember wondering if the place was about bankrupt, had been failing to pay its bills (possibly including players – and even if not, I’m still thinking that the players could be next) it was all too strange to see them disappear like that without raising an eyebrow.
Now how much influence this carries cannot be judged with any true measure, because its all so subtle.
Buts also still very much there and I think it probably has a bigger impact that one thinks. And I again provide CC as a great example.
Furthermore; CC I remind you was on the top when they fell. That translates to they were able to survive. I wonder if as much can be said of programs which will begin their slide from a point NOT at the top of the heap?
all I want is to be treated in a fair manner which is agreed upon previously to the begining of the partnership. I will knock myself out for the partner that does that.
Why would any place risk losing such a devoted ally who is proven to be able to find a way to be successful in such an ever-changing landscape is beyond rational thinking.
